Vince McMahon is known for his meticulous approach to crafting captivating wrestling shows. However, it has been observed that McMahon occasionally believed there could be an excess of wrestling on a given program, prioritizing other elements such as storylines and segments. This perspective, while generating both praise and criticism, sheds light on McMahon’s unique approach to the world of professional wrestling.
Matt Hardy recently shared some insights on this aspect during an episode of The Extreme Life of Matt Hardy. According to Hardy, there were instances where McMahon expressed concerns about an overabundance of wrestling content.
Hardy recalled McMahon stating, “There’s too much wrestling on this show!” This sentiment suggests that McMahon viewed the balance between wrestling matches and other elements as a crucial factor in delivering a captivating product to the audience.
Comparing McMahon’s perspective to that of AEW President Tony Khan, Hardy highlighted the differing philosophies between the two. McMahon, often championing the concept of “sports entertainment,” places significant importance on engaging storylines and the development of characters.
“I’m sure if he watched AEW, he’d say, ‘there’s too much wrestling on that show.'”
It’s no secret that Khan leans towards a more traditional, old-school approach to professional wrestling, where the in-ring action takes center stage and holds true consequences.
As professional wrestling continues to evolve, the balance between wrestling matches, storylines, and other segments remains a topic of debate amongst wrestling fans.
What are your thoughts on Vince McMahon’s perspective that there can be an excess of wrestling content on a wrestling show? Do you agree with his approach of prioritizing storylines and segments alongside the in-ring action? Leave a comment below.